Not since chocolate and peanut butter have two things ever meant to go together as much as these two stories.

First, we have researchers in China opining that they can’t conduct their research without Google:

Research without Google would be like life without electricity,” says Xiong Zhenqin, an ecologist at Nanjing Agricultural University in Jiangsu province.

In fact a study reveals…

More than 80% use the search engine to find academic papers; close to 60% use it to get information about scientific discoveries or other scientists’ research programmes; and one-third use it to find science-policy and funding news…84% of the scientists who responded to Nature’s survey say that losing Google would “somewhat or significantly” hamper their research

Maybe these scientists shouldn’t teach their students how to hack into US networks then, should they? ;-)

OK, story number two ties into this magically.

Google finally won approval…to be an electric utility…With their new approval to be a utility, Google could be a smart grid / smart charge service provider.

If I had a late night news show on the Comedy Channel, I’d so enjoy discussing the epic timing of these two stories! :-)

Pilgrim’s Partners: SponsoredReviews.com – Bloggers earn cash, Advertisers build buzz!



Origin: Andy Beal’s Marketing Pilgrim

jetskibum asked:


Horse and Ranch Informational video

SeoDesignOnline.com

l0rdtaz3r asked:


A tutorial on making a website. Basic stuff. More later.

Professional SEO Firm

If Google hasn’t gotten the message by now then they never will. The European Union has a bee in its bonnet about all things Google. It almost feels like there is an issue du jour as of late. The threat of anti-trust inquiries is the latest to surface out of the regulatory body and just to show that they are paying attention to everything Google does there is some concern over the Google’s Street View again.

The troubles are concerning how long Google keeps raw images in storage. These are the original photos taken that are then altered by blurring any potentially sensitive information like faces and license plate numbers. After this process is done then the photo is put into the Street View system. It’s how long the original images are kept that has the EU concerned. Yahoo! Finance reports

European Union data privacy regulators are telling Google Inc. to warn people before it sends cameras out into cities to take pictures for its Street View maps, adding to the company’s legal worries in Europe.

Google should shorten the time it keeps the original photos from one year to six months, regulators also said in a letter to the company obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday.

In a statement, Google said its need to retain Street View images for one year is “legitimate and justified.”

(I wonder if the people over at Yahoo don’t giggle a bit when they put these stories up but I digress.)

Google has had a rough time with this service in Europe since its inception with Greece demanding they halt the picture taking, German authorities forcing the company to remove images from those who request it and the pitchfork and torch crowd in an English village that attempted to stop the Google Street View car from getting to its appointed rounds.

So it appears that the EU has decided that Google may indeed be evil. While these initial salvos look like shots over the bow this could be laying the groundwork for bigger attacks.

What is your reaction to putting Google under the microscope? Is it warranted? Is it about time? As these events keep happening there will likely more well defined pro v. anti Google camps. Where are you setting up your tent?



Credit: Andy Beal’s Marketing Pilgrim

The UK’s Guardian newspaper demonstrates that intelligence goes out the window, once someone gets drawn in to Twitter.

Apparently banks, politicians, and even journalists are falling for the “this you??” phishing scam. One unfortunate BBC correspondent is apparently blissfully unaware that he is a victim, as you can still find this tweet on his Twitter stream:

And you thought the Brits weren’t great lovers! :-)

Anyway, so you don’t fall for the same scam, this video explains what to be on the look out for…

Join the Marketing Pilgrim Facebook Community



Credit: Andy Beal’s Marketing Pilgrim

toshtengs asked:


Slideshow featuring Angel and Katrina with the help of Tnomeralc Web Design Toys www.batangyagit.com

Free Professional SEO Software

As marketers, the Holy Grail is to put the right message in front of the right person at the right time so that they will do what is right: buy something. It’s a simple enough idea and many feel that we are well on our way to getting to that point with the use of behavioral targeting (BT). While from the marketers’ point of view this sounds all well and good there is a rising tide of concern that this practice will hit the wall soon over the word that makes every Internet marketer shiver: privacy.

MediaPost reports from the OMMA Behavioral conference yesterday that this is not going unnoticed by its practitioners.

Speaking at the OMMA Behavioral conference in New York, Adam Kasper, director of digital media at Media Contacts, warned that a “watershed moment” is coming for behavioral targeting when consumers gain greater awareness of the extent to which their online activity can be tracked and targeted, triggering a backlash.

“It’s the elephant in the room, and there’s going to be a point where consumers get it and there’s going to be a big public outcry,” said Kasper. For the most part, people don’t read privacy terms and conditions when they’re surfing the Web, so they’re not typically focused on the issue.

More and more I get the feeling that the industry as a whole is trying so hard to hold back what it really does to get information on people. Why? Because they know that when what happens with people’s data is brought into the light many people will feel that their privacy is being violated through a campaign of check boxes about fine print that no one truly reads or understands if they do read it. The industry sounds like a bunch of used car salesmen saying “Oh, don’t worry! She runs great and if you just sign here she’ll be yours and you’ll have NO problems! (wink, wink, nod, nod). They say this as they whisper to each other that they can’t believe what they are getting away with.

This “secret” isn’t likely to stay that way for much longer. Canada and the European Union appear hell bent on making sure that the Internet is safe for all and this practice will be targeted eventually. How wouldn’t it with people in the know talking like this

Melissa Adams, executive media director at Organic, noted that clients are already asking more questions about behavioral targeting even as they are drawn to its promise of more effective Web campaigns. “Clients are more interested in the details of where data is coming from than in the past,” she said.

Asked about whether that was a good sign, Adams said, “it’s positive if we can educate clients about the anonymity of it all and how it’s used to their benefit, but it’s a big bridge to cross to get them to understand there are safeguards in place.”

When you are asked at a conference if revealing the truth is a “good sign” that makes one wonder for sure what is really going on. And if that bridge referred to is big then it means that the industry’s not exactly rock solid with the whole anonymity and safety thing. As a result the industry is bracing itself for an event when someone makes a major privacy gaffe and the jig is up.

One way that the folks in this field think they can put fears to rest about data safety and people being truly aware of how they are tracked online is to set up a third party group to monitor the whole situation.

The panel more broadly agreed on the need for some type of third-party verification to vet the quality and sourcing of data supplied to agencies by outside technology vendors. That’s especially true as digital agencies are bombarded with pitches from myriad data providers and BT firms that all make similar promises about what their platforms can deliver.

If history has shown us anything it’s that when an industry talks about policing itself it is trying to do something to put regulatory suspicions to rest. The ability to say that “We’re watching the store and we promise to behave” (pun intended) is often enough to keep stronger rules and regulations from bigger groups (the government) from going on the books.

My suggestion for this industry is to act fast because once your elephant is out the stampede to figure out what is really going on might stop you dead in your tracks.



Hat Tip To: Andy Beal’s Marketing Pilgrim

The Web is increasingly becoming more “local” focused and savvy
designers and developers are working night and day to find creative and
innovative ways to present information to users in this context. Here are three
simple to deploy but excellent jQuery Plugins for those interested in
integrating Google Maps into their Web…



[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Original: Website Magazine

E-mail marketing service Campaigner has announced several new features to its existing set of tools designed to help smaller businesses effectively and efficiently meet their marketing needs. In addition to a new user interface and upgrades to numerous editing, formatting and list-management tools, the company—a division of Protus—is…



[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

By: Website Magazine

The release of AdMob’s January 2010 Mobile Metrics Report reveals some intriguing data from the mobile advertising network’s latest consumer survey, but the trends taking shape across iPhone, Android and Palm webOS application platforms are for the most part predictable.

The just-released report was compiled as a six-month follow-up…



[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Credit: Website Magazine

  • Navigation

  • Browsing blog archives for February, 2010.

    Recent Comments